CTP247PRE-LAUNCH

Coming soon.

CTP247 is cyber threat protection that never clocks out — autonomous agents watching your attack surface, brand, and the dark web 24/7. Leave your email and we'll let you know when it's live.

One email at launch. No newsletters, no marketing dripfeed.

CTP247
Get a demo

Scenarios

What CTP247 does
while you sleep.

Four real moments a SOC encounters in any given week. Each one, walked beat-by-beat, with the actual agent that takes each step. Not a feature list — a narrative of the product working.

Scenario

A new CISA KEV drops overnight.

CISA publishes a fresh exploited-vulnerability advisory. The CVE affects software you actually run. Most teams find out whenever someone next reads the bulletin. CTP247 catches it on the next feed cycle — and once ingested, the pipeline to a triaged alert takes seconds.

What lands on the analyst's desk

By the time the on-call analyst checks Slack, there's a triaged Critical alert with the CVE, the affected assets from your inventory, and a recommended remediation playbook.

04:00:02
Trigger

CISA KEV feed ingests new entry

The scheduled KEV pull picks up the new exploited-vulnerability row on its next cycle.

→ feed=cisa_kev · cve=CVE-2026-04812

04:00:09
triage

AI triage classifies against your tech stack

The triage agent matches the CVE's affected products against your declared stack. If it hits, an alert is opened with severity and reasoning.

→ match=Adobe Acrobat 24.x · severity=critical

04:00:31
investigation

Investigation pulls the asset blast radius

The investigation agent queries your asset inventory for assets matching the affected software and links them to the alert.

→ 23 assets in scope

04:00:34
alert

Critical alert lands with action

The alert names the CVE, the matched assets, and the recommended remediation playbook — prioritized by EPSS and KEV listing.

→ alert=ALERT-9817 · sla=4h

Scenario

A peer in your sector gets posted to a ransomware leak site.

A regional bank lands on the RansomHub onion site. The threat actor is active in your sector. Your CISO is going to ask, by sunrise: 'are we exposed to the same vector?'

What lands on the analyst's desk

Before sunrise, there's a hunt finding mapping the actor's TTPs against your environment, with named exposures the SOC can fix today.

02:08:11
Trigger

Ransomware leak feed catches the post

Tor-routed crawlers monitor leak sites continuously. New victim entries land in the feed within the polling window.

→ leak_site=ransomhub · victim=AcmeBank

02:08:42
hunter

Threat hunter pivots to the actor cluster

Hunter pulls the actor's known TTPs from the threat-actor catalogue and queues a hypothesis hunt against your environment.

→ actor=BlackBasta · ttps=12

02:09:08
hunter

TTPs cross-checked against your surface

The hunter looks for evidence of the actor's TTPs in your alerts, exposures, and IOC overlap. Findings are narrative, not just IDs.

→ T1133 · external remote services · 1 exposure

02:09:15
alert

Hunt finding ready for SOC

A hunt finding lands in the dashboard naming the actor, the matching TTP, the affected asset, and the recommended fix.

→ finding=HUNT-119 · severity=high

Scenario

Someone registers your-bank-secure.com.

A typosquat of your domain goes live. Within hours it'll have a phishing kit on it. Most teams find out from a customer's complaint. CTP247 finds out from the certificate transparency log.

What lands on the analyst's desk

Within minutes of registration, the takedown ticket is drafted to the registrar's abuse contact, waiting for analyst approval.

14:02:38
Trigger

CT log entry observed

With the streaming daemon enabled, CTP247 consumes the certificate-transparency WebSocket feed and scores new issuances against your domain similarity rules within its 30-second flush window.

→ cert=Let's Encrypt · domain=acmebank-secure.com

14:02:39
brand

Similarity scored against your brand

The brand defender computes lexical, visual, and homoglyph similarity. The 0.93 score puts this above the takedown threshold.

→ similarity=0.93 · floor=0.80

14:02:42
brand

Live probe confirms phishing

The agent fetches the new domain and runs the live-probe heuristic — page content, form targets, brand assets — attaching the verdict and screenshot to the suspect record.

→ verdict=phishing · ttp=T1566.002

14:02:44
case

Takedown drafted — analyst approves

The takedown letter is drafted to the registrar's abuse contact with all evidence attached. The analyst clicks Approve to send.

→ registrar=NameCheap · status=drafted

Scenario

Someone starts spoofing your domain in a phishing burst.

A sender you've never heard of starts mailing your customers as you. Their mailbox providers see it — and tell you, through the DMARC aggregate reports landing at the RUA address CTP247 monitors.

What lands on the analyst's desk

The failing source is identified, the alignment failure is root-caused, and the dashboard shows exactly which DMARC policy step shuts it down — with the evidence to justify it.

07:42:18
Trigger

DMARC aggregate report ingested

The mailbox worker pulls the RUA report and parses every source that sent mail claiming to be your domain.

→ reporter=google.com · 412 messages

07:42:19
triage

Failing source stands out

One source fails both SPF and DKIM alignment at volume — a pattern that doesn't match any of your legitimate senders.

→ source=185.101.94.215 · pass_rate=0%

07:42:48
investigation

Alignment failure root-caused

An alignment RCA run separates the misconfigured-legitimate-sender case from the hostile-spoof case, with reasoning attached.

→ verdict=spoof · not_in_spf=true

07:42:51
alert

Policy step recommended

The dashboard shows the failing source, the affected recipients' providers, and the DMARC policy progression that blocks it — evidence attached for the change request.

→ recommend=p:quarantine → p:reject

See it on your scenarios.

Pick the moment your team dreads most. We'll run CTP247 against your real feeds and show what it would have caught.

Book a demo